BCS Rankings Shake Up CFP Top 15: Notre Dame In, Oklahoma Out
As the college football playoff discussions intensify, fans and analysts are keen to explore the impact of the former BCS rankings. Utilizing the BCS computer formula, which was once pivotal in determining playoff standings, we can generate an alternate view of the current top 15 teams. This analysis weighs the results of six renowned computer ranking systems: Anderson & Hester, Richard Billingsley, Colley Matrix, Kenneth Massey, Jeff Sagarin, and Peter Wolfe.
Revised Rankings According to BCS Computers
The revised standings highlight several intriguing shifts among the teams. Here’s how the top 15 looks when processed through the BCS methodology:
| Rank | Team | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ohio State | 1.167 |
| 2 | Indiana | 2 |
| 3 | Oregon | 4.67 |
| 4 | Georgia | 5.33 |
| 5 | Ole Miss | 6.33 |
| 6 | Texas A&M | 6.67 |
| 7 | Texas Tech | 8.33 |
| 8 | Alabama | 8.5 |
| 9 | BYU | 8.67 |
| 10 | Notre Dame | 9 |
| 11 | Oklahoma | 9.167 |
| 12 | Vanderbilt | 13 |
| 13 | Miami (FL) | 13.5 |
| 14 | Utah | 13.833 |
| 15 | Texas | 14 |
Key Changes and Implications
- Ohio State leads the rankings, reflecting its consistent performance.
- Notre Dame has secured a position in the top 10, despite debates over its playoff eligibility.
- Oklahoma has dropped out of the top 10, showcasing a potential undervaluation in recent assessments.
Conclusion
This BCS-inspired examination shifts the conversation around the upcoming college football playoffs. With teams such as Indiana and Oregon ranking highly, there is room for discussion about biases and the role of analytics in shaping playoff opportunities. As the selection day approaches, these insights could influence fan expectations and team strategies.
