136 College Football Teams Ranked: Revealing CFP Decision Flaws

The College Football Playoff (CFP) selection committee faced significant criticism following its recent decisions. The most notable controversy arose when Alabama and Miami secured playoff spots while Notre Dame was excluded. This decision has sparked debate among fans and analysts alike.

Controversial CFP Rankings Explained

This week’s rankings revealed inconsistencies that left many questioning the committee’s judgment. Despite not participating in games, Miami surpassed Notre Dame in the rankings. Both teams had comparable records but did not compete last week.

Top-Performing Teams

In the Athletic 136’s latest ranking, no major changes occurred at the top aside from Indiana and Ohio State switching positions. While Miami secured a playoff berth, many believed that Notre Dame deserved consideration as well.

• Miami’s performance kept them ahead of Notre Dame despite a previous loss to SMU.
• Head-to-head records played a crucial role in evaluations across various teams.
• Oklahoma and Alabama were given favorable rankings based on their head-to-head results.

Impacts and Outcomes

This year’s CFP has drawn attention due to its implications. Notre Dame, viewed by some as a potential national championship contender, found themselves outside of the playoff picture. Critics argue the committee should have recognized the significance of head-to-head matchups earlier in the season.

Conference Championship Highlights

As conference championships concluded, key results influenced final rankings:

• Tulane advanced to No. 19 after winning the American Conference championship.
• James Madison rose to No. 20 following their Sun Belt victory.
• Duke improved its position within the rankings after clinching the ACC title.

Meanwhile, Alabama’s spot in the playoffs has generated mixed reactions following numerous lackluster performances. A recent loss to Oklahoma raised further questions about their placement.

Future of CFP Rankings

Discussions are ongoing regarding the need for adjustments in the CFP selection process. Issues such as overrated teams and realignment impacts on rankings are paramount. The experience from this season could prompt necessary changes for future evaluations.

As teams prepare for their upcoming bowl games, fans are eager to see how the rankings will affect tournament matchups. The College Football Playoff continues to spotlight the complexities of team selection and ranking in a competitive landscape.