Hegseth Targets Sen. Kelly’s Rank and Retirement in New Initiative
In a recent confrontation, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has targeted Senator Mark Kelly’s military rank and retirement. This initiative comes in the wake of a contentious video where Kelly and other lawmakers encouraged U.S. troops to refrain from following illegal orders.
Action Taken by Hegseth
Hegseth announced that he has initiated a formal 45-day process to review Kelly’s retirement status, citing the senator’s comments as seditious. This action includes a potential change to Kelly’s military rank and a corresponding reduction in his retirement pay, which could significantly impact his benefits.
Hegseth’s Statement
In his announcement, Hegseth said, “In response to Senator Mark Kelly’s seditious statements — and his pattern of reckless misconduct — the Department of War is taking administrative action against Captain Mark E. Kelly, USN (Ret).” He also confirmed that a formal censure letter would be added to Kelly’s official military file.
Senator Kelly’s Defense
Senator Kelly, a Democrat from Arizona, responded strongly to Hegseth’s actions. He emphasized that he earned his rank through dedicated service, including combat experience and his role as an astronaut. Kelly voiced his outrage over what he deemed attempts by Hegseth and the Trump administration to suppress free speech among retired military personnel.
- Kelly stated, “My rank and retirement are things that I earned through my service and sacrifice.”
- He stressed his commitment to fight back against these administrative actions.
Background on Mark Kelly
Prior to his political career, Kelly served for 25 years as a Navy pilot. His military background subjects him to the military code of justice, complicating his current situation. Despite this, he remains adamant about his rights and willingness to oppose the actions taken against him.
Pentagon Investigation
In addition to Hegseth’s actions, the Pentagon launched an investigation into Kelly in November. This further escalates the tensions between the senator and the current administration.
As the situation develops, it raises significant questions about free speech and the treatment of military veterans in the political arena. Kelly’s determination to counter these actions highlights the ongoing battle between expressing dissent and the repercussions imposed by military authority.