Ports Authority Sues ANPYN and Challenges Judge Calvete
The conflict over the management of the Puerto de Ushuaia has intensified, as the Dirección Provincial de Puertos (DPP) has initiated legal action against the Agencia Nacional de Puertos y Navegación (ANPYN). The DPP seeks to challenge a recent decision that significantly impacts local control of the port.
Legal Action Against ANPYN
On January 20, ANPYN imposed an administrative intervention at the Puerto de Ushuaia, set to last for twelve months. This intervention involved suspending the port’s accreditation for a year and took effect despite complaints from the provincial authority.
Key Legal Requests from DPP
- The DPP has filed a request for an immediate injunction to halt ANPYN’s intervention.
- They wish to reverse the previous directive demanding the provision of local port personnel.
- The DPP argues that the national takeover infringes on provincial governance and effectively displaces local authorities.
Impact of the Intervention
The DPP contends that the national intervention has already led to tangible restrictions at the port. Accessibility to the terminal has been limited, and operational management has been handed over to national authorities. This shift affects financial management and impacts port funding, according to DPP representatives.
Political and Legal Dimensions
The dispute is deeply rooted in political and institutional dynamics. The DPP maintains that the Puerto de Ushuaia is provincially owned, governed by local law, and is meant to operate autonomously.
In a bid to assert local jurisdiction, the DPP has previously filed administrative appeals against the intervention measures, but after receiving no response, they escalated the matter to Federal Justice.
Supreme Court Involvement
In addition to challenging ANPYN’s actions, the provincial government has also launched a case of unconstitutionality before the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation. This escalates the situation, adding a federal dimension to the conflict.
Recusal of Judge Calvete
The DPP has further complicated matters by recusing Judge Federico Calvete, who was overseeing the initial legal proceedings related to the case. While recusal does not require detailed justification, it amplifies existing tensions within this high-stakes dispute.
Conclusion
The Puerto de Ushuaia is crucial for regional logistics and the cruise season, making it a significant focal point in this ongoing dispute. The contrasting narratives from ANPYN and DPP highlight the complexity of the situation, involving safety concerns, economic implications, and the legitimacy of the intervention.
