Supreme Court Restores Telehealth Abortion Access Over Samuel Alito Dissent
The Supreme Court restored telehealth access to abortion pills on Thursday over dissents from Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas. The emergency order blocked a 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling that had stopped providers from prescribing and mailing mifepristone through telemedicine.
For providers using telehealth, the order keeps nationwide prescribing and mailing of the drug open for now. For patients who receive medication through interstate telemedicine, it preserves a route that blue states had already protected by letting their providers send the pills across state lines.
Samuel Alito and the Roe reversal
Alito, who wrote the 2022 decision overturning Roe v. Wade, said blue states had undermined that ruling by outsmarting anti-abortion lawmakers. His dissent put the fight over mifepristone back at the center of the legal aftermath of that decision.
Thomas went further. He said, “It is a criminal offense to ship mifepristone for use in abortions.” He also said the drug’s manufacturers “are not entitled to a stay of an adverse court order based on lost profits from their criminal enterprise” and cannot “be irreparably harmed by a court order that makes it more difficult for them to commit crimes.”
Louisiana and the 5th Circuit
The 5th Circuit acted at Louisiana’s request and tried to stop the flow of mifepristone into states that criminalize reproductive health care. The Biden administration said it was heavily contested whether the Comstock Act applies to the conduct at issue.
Mark Joseph Stern said Thomas suggested that abortion providers who mail mifepristone should be thrown in prison rather than granted relief by the Supreme Court. Madiba Dennie said the language was trying to legitimize a fringe theory that the Comstock Act does apply here and should be used to prosecute many people.
Telemedicine access after Thursday
The practical effect of the order is narrow but immediate: telehealth prescribing and mailing continue while the case moves through the courts. Patients and providers relying on interstate mail access keep that channel open unless a future ruling changes it.