Carl Rinsch gets 2 1/2 years in Netflix fraud case

Carl Rinsch was sentenced to 2 1/2 years in prison after defrauding Netflix out of $11 million tied to White Horse.

Published
2 Min Read
4 Views
Carl Rinsch gets 2 1/2 years in Netflix fraud case

Carl Rinsch was sentenced Monday to 2 1/2 years in prison after a federal fraud case over White Horse, the unfinished sci-fi series he pitched to Netflix. The sentencing in New York ended a case that turned on how Netflix’s money was used after the company paid far more than $11 million in additional funding.

- Advertisement -

Rinsch apologized in court and said, “This process has forced me to confront things about my health, my judgment and my life.” He also told the judge, “I failed to recognize the danger of the state I was in.”

New York sentencing

U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff presided over the hearing. Prosecutors had asked for five years, while Rinsch received 2 1/2 years in prison after his December conviction on federal wire fraud and other charges.

The sentence matters because it fixes the criminal penalty in a case that had already tied up a large sum of production money and left a never-finished project behind. Netflix initially paid Rinsch about $44 million for White Horse in 2018 and 2019, then sent another $11 million in 2020 after he said he needed more money to wrap up production.

Netflix money and spending

Prosecutors and trial testimony said Rinsch diverted the money into a personal account instead of finishing the series. Prosecutors said he spent $638,000 on two mattresses, bought five Rolls-Royces and a red Ferrari, and spent $652,000 on watches and clothes. Prosecutors also said he used some of the money to pay off about $1.8 million in credit card bills.

- Advertisement -

That spending pattern is central to the case because it is what prosecutors used to show where the money went after Netflix sent it for White Horse. Prosecutors said Rinsch told Netflix he needed the $11 million to complete the project, then moved the funds away from production costs and into personal purchases and debts.

Keanu Reeves letter

Keanu Reeves asked the court to show Rinsch leniency in a letter that described him as someone who can “bring exceptional joy and warmth to the people around him” and “can self-sabotage by amplifying the scale, scope and landscape of what had been negotiated.” Reeves also wrote that the outcome “might be tempered with measures of leniency and mercy as well as justice.”

David Markewitz took the opposite view in court, saying, “Mr. Rinsch had every possible advantage,” and that his motive “was naked greed.” The case now moves into the restitution side of the judgment, with about $11 million tied to the loss Netflix says it suffered from the failed production.

For Netflix, the practical result is a criminal sentence attached to a project that never got finished and a restitution figure that still hangs over the case. For Rinsch, the prison term is set; the financial aftermath remains the part that will shape what comes next.

- Advertisement -

Advertisement
Share This Article
Arts writer and cultural critic covering theatre, fine art, and the independent music scene. Regular contributor to The Atlantic and Rolling Stone.