Chris Paul’s one-year Spurs gamble now looks like the kind of move contenders regret losing — Chris Paul

Chris Paul gave the Spurs late-game stability on a one-year deal, and his absence in Game 4 showed how much that mattered.

Published
2 Min Read
Chris Paul’s one-year Spurs gamble now looks like the kind of move contenders regret losing — Chris Paul

The uncomfortable truth is this: the Spurs may have been better placed to matter in the NBA Finals if they had kept Chris Paul around a little longer. That is not nostalgia talking. It is the simple reality of what happens when a team spends years rebuilding, finally gets to the biggest stage, and then looks short of calm when the game tightens late.

- Advertisement -

In the summer of 2024, the Spurs brought Chris Paul in on a one-year, $11M deal, and the logic was obvious. He was never going to be the long-term answer, but he was exactly the sort of veteran backcourt stabilizer a young team needed. Wemby’s second season showed the point of it all: the development, the structure, the playmaking, the sense that somebody in the room knew how to slow the noise down. That is what Paul still offered, even late in his career.

The late-game problem was always going to show up eventually

After Paul’s contract finished, he signed with the Los Angeles Clippers, and now the Spurs are left wondering what they lost with him. During Game 4 of this year’s NBA Finals series, the late fourth quarter exposed the issue in brutal fashion: the Spurs struggled to organize their offense when it mattered most. That is where experienced guards earn their money. That is where one veteran possession can save a night, or at least stop it from spiraling.

Chris Paul himself has been frank about the toll of time, saying, “Majority of my life, I've been missing things.” Fair enough. No one is pretending he was the player of a decade ago. But the bigger point is that the Spurs did not need the old version. They needed the version that understands pace, spacing and sanity under pressure. On a night like Game 4, that can be the difference between looking like a contender and looking like a team still searching for answers.

That is why this decision now feels so significant. The Spurs went through a years-long rebuild to get here, which makes the margins even more unforgiving. Once you reach the NBA Finals, the lesson is not that every roster move was perfect. It is that the small ones can echo all the way to the biggest stage. Losing Chris Paul may not have broken the Spurs. But it may have left them without the kind of late-game organiser that contenders cannot really do without.

Advertisement
TAGGED:
Share This Article
Sports writer with 9 years on the NFL and NBA beat. Sideline reporter and credentialed press member at three Super Bowls.