Brothers Accused in $25M Crypto Heist Blame ‘Victims’ During Trial

ago 2 hours
Brothers Accused in $25M Crypto Heist Blame ‘Victims’ During Trial

In a significant case unfolding in Manhattan, two brothers, Anton and James Peraire-Bueno, face accusations of conducting a $25 million cryptocurrency heist. Prosecutors allege that the brothers ingeniously exploited a vulnerability in the Ethereum blockchain, executing the theft within a mere 12 seconds in April 2023.

The Allegations Against the Peraire-Bueno Brothers

Federal prosecutors describe the crime as a meticulously planned fraud scheme that took at least three months to orchestrate. They argue that the brothers used bait transactions to study the trading habits of three victim traders before setting a trap for their automated trading bots. The defendants are accused of taking advantage of these bots by offering enticing crypto trades that the bots could not resist.

Details of the Heist

  • The heist was executed in just 12 seconds.
  • Prosecutors claim the brothers searched for terms like “how to wash crypto” and “top crypto lawyers.”
  • Victims ended up with worthless cryptocurrencies instead of their intended investments.

To cover their tracks, the Peraire-Bueno brothers allegedly created a complex network of shell companies and utilized foreign crypto exchanges. They masked their identities and the whereabouts of the stolen funds, ensuring that their fraudulent activities went undetected.

Defense Strategy

The brothers’ defense attorneys assert that their actions do not constitute fraud. They argue that in the decentralized landscape of cryptocurrency, there is no governing authority. Defense attorney Patrick Looby claims economic incentives dictate behavior within this environment and insists that the prosecution’s allegations are based on a misunderstanding of the law.

  • The defense argues there was no direct interaction with the victims.
  • They contend that the alleged victims made risky investments on their own.
  • Previous legal decisions have not classified actions like these as criminal.

The defense maintains that the victims were engaging in pre-programmed trades without any communication with the Peraire-Bueno brothers. As a result, they argue there was no intent to defraud, as the concept of theft has typically not included actions conducted in this manner.

Trial Outlook

The trial is set to begin in Manhattan federal court, with proceedings expected to continue into the first week of November. The outcome could significantly influence the legal landscape surrounding cryptocurrency trading and regulation in the United States, particularly amid ongoing discussions about establishing clearer guidelines in this emerging market.

As the case unfolds, it serves as a pivotal moment in addressing the intersection of technology, law, and finance in the world of cryptocurrency.