Dynamite Writer Challenges Pentagon’s View on Missile Portrayal
The Netflix thriller “House of Dynamite,” directed by Kathryn Bigelow, has sparked a notable discussion with the Pentagon regarding its portrayal of U.S. missile defense systems. Screenwriter Noah Oppenheim responded to the Pentagon’s critique during an appearance on MSNBC’s The Weekend.
Diverging Views on Missile Defense Depictions
The Pentagon issued an internal memo on October 16, asserting that U.S. missile interceptors have achieved a 100 percent accuracy rate in testing over the past decade. In response, Oppenheim stated, “We respectfully disagree.” He emphasized that the film illustrates the imperfections of missile defense systems.
Research Behind the Film
Oppenheim acknowledged that neither he nor Bigelow consulted the Pentagon while making the film. However, they conducted extensive research, interviewing multiple missile defense experts for insights. He noted, “Unfortunately, our missile defense system is highly imperfect.” Oppenheim expressed a willingness to engage in discussions with the Pentagon about improving defense capabilities to enhance public safety.
Key Scenes in “House of Dynamite”
The film emphasizes a gripping nuclear crisis, focusing on the critical 18 minutes it takes for U.S.-launched interceptor missiles to potentially reach Chicago. A pivotal scene showcases the failure of the mid-course missile intercept system to neutralize an incoming threat. This dramatic representation contrasts with the Pentagon’s claims of real-world system accuracy.
Reception and Commentary
Critical feedback on “House of Dynamite” reflects its emotional depth. Reviewer David Rooney from The Hollywood Reporter highlighted the tension and fear displayed by military officials and an officer’s poignant phone call to his mother. Such moments enhance the film’s impact, questioning whether the threat is successfully intercepted.
Acknowledgment of the Pentagon’s Concerns
Oppenheim expressed gratitude for the Pentagon’s attention to the film. “I’m so glad the Pentagon watched, or is watching and is paying attention to it, because this is exactly the conversation we want to have,” he said. This exchange has opened avenues for further dialogue regarding missile defense perceptions and realities.
