Experts Reveal How Xi Strategically Outmaneuvered Trump
In a recent meeting between U.S. President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping, key concessions were made that could shift the dynamics of the ongoing trade tensions between the two nations. This dialogue, held on October 30, 2025, in Busan, South Korea, has prompted experts to analyze how Xi may have strategically maneuvered around Trump’s trade policies.
Meeting Overview and Concessions
The United States agreed to multiple concessions during this pivotal discussion:
- A 10% reduction in tariffs targeting China, particularly concerning fentanyl.
- The suspension of a proposed 100% tariff set to take effect on November 1.
- An extension of a pause on reciprocal tariffs for an additional year.
Conversely, China proposed to prolong a pause on export controls of rare earth minerals, which had initially been a response to Trump’s tariffs. Both parties acknowledged that this agreement would require renegotiation within a year.
Strategic Manipulation of Trade Policies
Experts have pointed out that Xi has effectively utilized China’s dominance in rare earth minerals as a strategic advantage. Jonathan Czin from the Brookings Institution remarked that this has led to a situation where the Trump administration is reacting rather than proactively negotiating, transforming trade discussions into a game of “whack-a-mole”.
Moreover, commentators like Nicholas Kristof from The New York Times indicated that the agreement may signify a retreat for the U.S., putting it in a weaker position overall. The tariffs initiated by Trump allowed China to “weaponize” its control over critical resources.
Ongoing Challenges and Future Negotiations
Geopolitical analysts have described the meeting as offering temporary relief rather than a long-term solution. Craig Singleton, a senior fellow, emphasized that while it prevents immediate escalation, it lacks substantive breakthroughs.
Further discussions on China’s potential commitments, such as increasing imports of U.S. agricultural products, remain uncertain. Trump also noted the importance of the tech sector, particularly semiconductor chip sales, stating that the arbitration lies with companies like Nvidia. Additionally, he mentioned the significance of ongoing Chinese purchases of Russian oil, indicating a lack of leverage in persuading Beijing to alter this relationship.
Conclusion
As the results of this meeting unfold, it remains clear that Xi has adeptly positioned China to navigate through Trump’s trade challenges. While both leaders have expressed optimism, the outcomes suggest that deeper issues require addressing in future negotiations.
