Pavuk Charged Over $49,347 on Peco Bills, DoorDash
Danielle M. Pavuk, a 42-year-old Huntingdon Valley woman, was charged last month after Montgomery Township detectives said she used a construction company credit card for more than $49,000 in personal expenses, including peco bills. Police said the alleged spending ran from June 8 to Nov. 5, 2025.
The total at issue was $49,347, according to police, who said the charges include felony theft by deception and access device fraud, along with two misdemeanor forgery counts. Pavuk is free on $5,000 unsecured bail and is scheduled for a formal arraignment on June 3.
Stump Road records
Police said the employer was a Montgomery Township construction company on Stump Road. The company’s chief financial officer went to police headquarters on Nov. 7, 2025, to report the alleged misuse, giving detectives two sets of bank statements that showed discrepancies in merchants’ names.
Detectives said the certified bank statement showed purchases made for Pavuk’s own gain and that she allegedly altered merchant names to make the expenses look like legitimate business charges. West Chester attorney Nicholas Beeson represents her.
DoorDash and Amazon
Police said the alleged spending covered DoorDash, Amazon, rent and peco bills. Detectives applied for search warrants tied to the DoorDash and Amazon purchases made with the card over several months, and the warrants reportedly linked the purchases back to Pavuk’s address on the 2000 block of Jason Drive.
The case turns on the paper trail, not just the purchases. Investigators said the bank statements, merchant-name changes and search-warrant results all pointed to the same card use, while the criminal charges now place Pavuk’s handling of company money before a judge on June 3.
June 3 arraignment
Pavuk faces felony and misdemeanor charges tied to the same alleged spending period, and the court date will put the accusations into a formal proceeding. For the company, the immediate issue is the documented $49,347 in disputed charges and the question of how much of that amount can be traced to personal spending versus business records.
