Chicago’s Acquisition Fails to Make an Impact
On Tuesday, the Chicago Bears and Cleveland Browns made headlines as they approached the NFL’s 4 p.m. ET trade deadline. Chicago secured edge rusher Joe Tryon-Shoyinka from Cleveland, sending a sixth-round draft pick in return. The Bears also exchanged a seventh-round pick as part of the deal.
Key Details of the Trade
- Teams Involved: Chicago Bears and Cleveland Browns
- Player Acquired: Joe Tryon-Shoyinka
- Cleveland Draft Picks Received: Sixth-round and seventh-round picks
- Impact Player Lost: Dayo Odeyingbo (injured)
This acquisition comes as the Bears look to bolster their defensive line after Odeyingbo, who had shown promise with two tackles for loss and one sack, suffered a torn Achilles injury in Week 9 against the Bengals. Before his injury, Odeyingbo was seen as a key player following his free-agent signing.
Joe Tryon-Shoyinka’s Performance
Despite being a first-round pick in 2021, Tryon-Shoyinka has struggled to make an impact. He has not recorded a sack in eight games with Cleveland and played only 6% of the team’s defensive snaps. Over his four-plus seasons in the NFL, he has compiled 15 sacks but has only exceeded one sack in a game twice.
This trade is viewed as a low-risk move for the Bears. General manager Ryan Poles is navigating a challenging season, with the Bears currently at 5–3 and fighting for a playoff spot, something they haven’t achieved since the Mitchell Trubisky era. The team faces tough upcoming matches against rivals including Green Bay, Detroit, and San Francisco.
Implications for Cleveland
For the Browns, the loss of Tryon-Shoyinka is not expected to have significant repercussions. Cleveland is struggling with just two wins so far this season and does not appear to be a playoff contender. The team’s focus seems to be on improving its draft position for the future.
Evaluation of the Trade
The Bears’ acquisition of Tryon-Shoyinka has drawn mixed reviews. While it provides some depth to their defensive line, many analysts regard him as more of a roster filler than a difference-maker. The trade has been rated around a C for Chicago, while Cleveland’s decision garnered a B- grade due to its potential long-term benefits.
As the Bears attempt to build momentum for a playoff run, the effectiveness of this trade will remain under close scrutiny.
