Campbell Soup VP Secretly Recorded Discussing 3D-Printed Bioengineered Meat and Chicken
A recent incident involving Campbell Soup Company’s Vice President, Martin Bally, has raised serious concerns about workplace culture and ethics. A former employee, Robert Garza, revealed that he secretly recorded Bally making disparaging comments about the company’s products and employees.
Details of the Recording
Garza, who was employed remotely as a security analyst since September 2024, claimed Bally expressed a disdain for Campbell’s offerings. He stated, “We have st for fking poor people. Who buys our st? I don’t buy Campbell’s products barely anymore.” During the hour-long recording, Bally also criticized bioengineered meats, saying, “I don’t wanna eat a piece of chicken that came from a 3-D printer.”
Racist Remarks and Drug Use Allegations
The recording included several controversial remarks, including humiliating comments directed at Indian employees. Garza reported that Bally stated, “Fing Indians don’t know a fking thing,” reflecting a disturbing attitude toward his coworkers. Furthermore, Bally allegedly admitted to coming to work high from marijuana edibles.
Legal Action and Retaliation Claims
Following the recording, Garza reported Bally’s comments to his supervisor, J.D. Aupperle, in January 2025. Just weeks later, on January 30, Garza was fired, which he and his attorney allege was retaliation for raising concerns about Bally’s behavior. Garza described his dismissal as shocking, noting that he had received no prior disciplinary action and had been praised for his performance during the same meeting.
- Lawsuit Filed: Garza filed a lawsuit against Campbell Soup Company, Bally, and Aupperle in Wayne County Circuit Court.
- Claims: The lawsuit alleges a racially hostile work environment, retaliation, and admission of drug use at work.
- Time to Find New Employment: Garza stated it took him 10 months to secure another job after his dismissal.
Company’s Response
In response to the allegations, Campbell Soup Company issued a statement indicating that if the comments were accurate, they were unacceptable. The company asserted that these comments do not reflect its values or corporate culture and are currently investigating the matter.
Robert Garza’s experience highlights significant concerns regarding workplace ethics and the treatment of employees within major corporations. As this situation unfolds, it raises questions about oversight and accountability in corporate environments.
