Family Sues SLC Airport Over Son’s Tragic Jet Engine Death

The tragic death of 30-year-old Kyler Efinger at Salt Lake City International Airport has led his parents to file a lawsuit against the city. They believe there were critical oversights in the airport’s safety protocols that contributed to their son’s death.

Incident Overview

Kyler Efinger passed away after crawling into a running jet engine. This incident occurred on January 1, 2024, around 9:54 p.m. His parents claim that if authorities had acted sooner, Kyler might have survived.

Details Surrounding the Tragedy

According to the lawsuit, Kyler went through airport security at approximately 8:50 p.m. He was en route to Denver to visit a sick grandparent. After passing security, he experienced a manic episode, prompting him to leave his gate and wander the airport.

• Time through security: 8:50 p.m.
• Emergency exit breach: 9:54 p.m.
• Reported sighting near runway: 10:04 p.m.

Lack of Airport Security Measures

The lawsuit argues that the airport lacked sufficient systems to prevent unauthorized access to the tarmac. When Kyler exited through an emergency exit door, officials were not immediately notified, which hampered the search efforts.

Search Efforts and Miscommunication

The lawsuit highlights numerous issues with the response during the search for Kyler. Initially, police were informed of disturbances in the stores, leading them to focus on the wrong areas. It wasn’t until 10:02 p.m. that dispatchers directed them correctly.

Critical Moments Leading to Death

After exiting the terminal, Kyler approached the runway area. Reports indicate he was seen near an Airbus A220-100 as it began taxiing following air traffic control instructions. Unfortunately, the engine was running at the time.

• Kyler’s location notifications were delayed.
• He climbed into the plane’s engine at approximately 10:08 p.m.

Legal Proceedings

The Efingers are seeking a jury trial to determine damages due to the alleged negligence of airport authorities. Salt Lake City has declined to comment on pending litigation.

This case raises serious questions about airport security and emergency response protocols. As the Efingers pursue justice, their story sheds light on the potential consequences of lapses in safety measures.