F35 Shot Down as Trump Warns Tehran ‘More to Follow’ After Strike Destroys Iran’s Largest Bridge
As talk of f35 shot down spreads alongside intensifying rhetoric, President Donald Trump claimed responsibility for the destruction of Iran’s largest bridge and warned there would be “much more to follow” if a settlement is not reached to end the five-week-long war he started.
What Happens When F35 Shot Down Talk Collides With Confirmed Strikes?
Trump posted footage showing part of a newly built suspension bridge between Tehran and Karaj collapsing onto the causeway below, accompanied by a rising plume of black smoke. The bridge was described as newly completed, 136 metres high, and a $400 million project. The strike split the structure in half, with later imagery showing a clear gap at the heart of what had been presented as a premier infrastructure project.
Iran’s state media in Karaj said eight people were killed and 95 wounded. The middle of the bridge was struck twice. It remained unclear whether civilians were using the bridge at the time of the attack, though there appeared to be a lorry on one side of the span. One video appeared to show a projectile hitting a section where damage already existed.
Trump’s messaging framed the attack as leverage: he said the bridge would never be used again and warned of escalation if a settlement was not reached. The public focus on major infrastructure damage has also sharpened attention around battlefield claims circulating in parallel—such as f35 shot down—even as the confirmed details in this moment center on the bridge strike and broader threats.
What If the War’s Strategic Objectives Are “Nearing Completion” — But Escalation Continues?
A day before the bridge strike, Trump said in a primetime speech that the war the United States and Israel launched on Iran on 28 February was a success “nearing completion, ” and that the United States would “very shortly” achieve nearly all its strategic objectives. In the same White House address, he repeated a threat to destroy Iran’s power plants, a move that could cut off electricity to millions of people. He reiterated that threat again in a social media post after the bridge strike.
The bridge strike formed part of what were described as several confirmed attacks in Iran this week. The flow of information has been constrained by Iran’s internet shutdown, making it difficult to obtain unsanctioned details from inside the country. Within that environment, imagery can become central to shaping narratives: footage earlier this week of a major strike on a missile base in the city of Isfahan was confirmed on Thursday as genuine, showing fiery plumes and secondary explosions filmed from a nearby car, with the driver expressing surprise at the scale of the attack.
Isfahan was also described as a location where Iran is thought to have moved some or all of its 440kg stockpile of 60% enriched uranium, material that in theory could be used to make 10 nuclear bombs if enriched to 90% and if Tehran still had the technology available. There was speculation in the United States that Trump has considered a high-risk airborne raid to seize radioactive material from underground storage, though Trump said late on Wednesday that it was buried so deeply that “I don’t care. ” The context also noted that Trump has engaged in misdirection in the past.
What Happens Next If Threats Expand to Power Plants and Iran Vows Broader Attacks?
Alongside the bridge strike, other claims and counterclaims continue. Iran said the Pasteur medical institute in Tehran was hit on Thursday. Israel said it had struck a headquarters used by Iran’s Revolutionary Guard to finance armed proxies across the Middle East the day before.
Iran, for its part, warned of escalation. It said it would conduct “more crushing, broader and more destructive” attacks in the future, and that the war would continue until the “permanent regret and surrender” of Iran’s enemies, in remarks attributed to Ebrahim Zolfaqari, described as a spokesperson.
For now, the clearest verified marker of escalation is the attack on the bridge and the explicit threat to expand strikes to electricity generation. With information restricted and rhetoric rising, attention will continue to swing between what is visually documented and what is politically signaled—including claims such as f35 shot down that travel quickly in wartime environments, even as the confirmed record here centers on infrastructure destruction, threats to power plants, and vows of wider attacks.
